![]() |
January 03, 2005Despair is the agendaHere's how the Globe and Mail summed up events in Iraq yesterday: Insurgents exposed the vulnerability of Iraq's security forces again yesterday, killing 18 National Guardsmen, five police officers and several civilians in separate attacks with the election of a national assembly just weeks away. Prominent Shia leaders called for unity with Sunnis wanting to delay the vote, but insisted it be held despite the violence.But something else happened yesterday, that involved 'Iraq's poorly equipped security forces': 1. At 1 am Iraqi National Guard (ING), the Mahmudih division, arrested 217 individuals suspected of being terrorists and confiscated a large cache of light and heavy caliber weapons and ammunition.There's a bit of good news at the end of the Globe report -- that Shia leaders are publicly reaching out to Sunnis and urging restraint and tolerance -- but news that progress against the 'insurgents' is being made by the Iraqi forces is never mentioned. It doesn't fit the narrative. Instead, an opinion piece elsewhere in the paper makes this claim: It makes perfect sense to build up the Iraqi police and other security forces to repress crime, but these groups have conspicuously failed to be of any help in dealing with the Sunni insurgents who keep attacking U.S. forces, or with the Mahdi militiamen of the Shia rabble rouser Muqtada al-Sadr. At best, the police remain neutral when any Iraqis attack foreign troops. At worst, they join in the attacks, or give their uniforms and vehicles to the attackers, sometimes allowing them to surprise coalition troops with deadly results. Iraqi police have even failed to pursue with any real energy the insurgents who have targeted the Iraqi police themselves. Such behaviour is inevitable because Iraqi policemen and their families live among the population at large, at the mercy of the very insurgents and militiamen they are supposed to control.Calling those who risk their lives to wear their new nation's uniform cowards and traitors is pretty vile, but that's what passes as sophisticated commentary in these crazy times. Arthur Chrenkoff has this summary of the works of the 'neutral' Iraqi Forces: In recent security successes: "Iraqi Security Forces defeated two separate attacks in Mosul by anti-Iraqi insurgents as they attempted to ambush an Iraqi National Guard patrol and seize a police station in northern Iraq"; the capture of remote-controlled rockets smuggled in from outside Iraq for use against election infrastructure; the capture of two senior al Qaeda operatives active in Iraq; seizure of another significant arms cache near Ar Rutbath; and the defeat by Iraqi security forces of an attack on a police station in Mosul ("This is the sixth time since Nov. 10 where insurgents have tried but failed to overrun police stations"). In addition, 353 foreign terrorists are currently in custody in Iraq. This total includes "61 Egyptians, 59 Saudis, 56 Syrians, 40 Jordanians, 35 Sudanese, 22 Iranians, 10 Tunisians, 10 Yemenis, eight Palestinians and five Lebanese, among others."I don't believe that everything is peaches and cream in Iraq, but the notion rooted firmly in the public's conciousness that the situation is hopeless is certainly not correct either. Though the terrorists began the post-war period with many advantages -- hidden weapon stores, money, support networks and a command structure -- these are being systematically dismantled and destroyed. Each attack they make weakens them, and each day those they oppose grow stronger. They can't win, yet the press continues to root for them. They trumpet their successful atrocities, and bury or ignore their many failures. Someday, when Iraq is a thriving, free nation, I hope they have the awareness to feel ashamed of themselves for what they did. Posted by Bruce Gottfred at January 3, 2005 11:56 AM | TrackBack Comments
Post a comment
|